State v. Buelow

2012 Ohio 5764, 984 N.E.2d 9, 134 Ohio St. 3d 589
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 7, 2012
Docket2012-0631
StatusPublished

This text of 2012 Ohio 5764 (State v. Buelow) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Buelow, 2012 Ohio 5764, 984 N.E.2d 9, 134 Ohio St. 3d 589 (Ohio 2012).

Opinion

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of State v. Howard, 134 Ohio St.3d 467, 2012-Ohio-5738, 983 N.E.2d 341.

O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, Cupp, and McGee Brown, JJ., concur. *590 Mathias H. Heck Jr., Montgomery County Prosecuting Attorney, and Johnna M. Shia, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellant. Jennifer S. Getty, for appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Howard
2012 Ohio 5738 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2012 Ohio 5764, 984 N.E.2d 9, 134 Ohio St. 3d 589, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-buelow-ohio-2012.