State v. Buelow

Ohio Supreme Court

State v. Buelow

2012 Ohio 5764, 984 N.E.2d 9, 134 Ohio St. 3d 589

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided December 7, 2012·No. 2012-0631·Published

Opinion

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of State v. Howard, 134 Ohio St.3d 467, 2012-Ohio-5738, 983 N.E.2d 341.

O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, Cupp, and McGee Brown, JJ., concur. *590 Mathias H. Heck Jr., Montgomery County Prosecuting Attorney, and Johnna M. Shia, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellant. Jennifer S. Getty, for appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of State v. Howard, 134 Ohio St.3d 467, 2012-Ohio-5738, 983 N.E.2d 341.

O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, Cupp, and McGee Brown, JJ., concur. *590 Mathias H. Heck Jr., Montgomery County Prosecuting Attorney, and Johnna M. Shia, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellant. Jennifer S. Getty, for appellee.

State v. Buelow, 2012 Ohio 5764, 984 N.E.2d 9, 134 Ohio St. 3d 589 (Ohio 2012).

Pincite

2012 Ohio 5764 (State v. Buelow) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related