State v. Buell

Connecticut Appellate Court

State v. Buell

577 A.2d 1073, 22 Conn. App. 809, 1990 Conn. App. LEXIS 254

CourtConnecticut Appellate Court

DecidedJune 27, 1990

Docket8552

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 577 A.2d 1073 (State v. Buell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Appellate Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Buell, 577 A.2d 1073, 22 Conn. App. 809, 1990 Conn. App. LEXIS 254 (Colo. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The defendant in this appeal complains that the trial court lacked the authority to impose a sentence for the original offense that ran consecutive to the sentence for the subsequent offense¹ and, that in doing so, the trial court violated his federal and state constitutional rights against double jeopardy.

In essence, the defendant claims that the trial court could not impose a sentence for a probation violation consecutive to a sentence he was then serving. This claim is without merit. This court has held to the contrary. See, e.g., State v. Ryerson, 20 Conn. App. 572, 576, 570 A.2d 709 (1990); State v. Gaskin, 7 Conn. App. 131, 135, 508 A.2d 40 (1986).

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The defendant in this appeal complains that the trial court lacked the authority to impose a sentence for the original offense that ran consecutive to the sentence for the subsequent offense¹ and, that in doing so, the trial court violated his federal and state constitutional rights against double jeopardy.

In essence, the defendant claims that the trial court could not impose a sentence for a probation violation consecutive to a sentence he was then serving. This claim is without merit. This court has held to the contrary. See, e.g., State v. Ryerson, 20 Conn. App. 572, 576, 570 A.2d 709 (1990); State v. Gaskin, 7 Conn. App. 131, 135, 508 A.2d 40 (1986).

The judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

577 A.2d 1073, 22 Conn. App. 809, 1990 Conn. App. LEXIS 254, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-buell-connappct-1990.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack