State v. Budke
371 N.W.2d 533, 1985 Minn. LEXIS 1144
Opinion
Donald and Kathleen Budke were convicted of violating Minnesota’s compulsory school attendance law. On appeal, a three-judge district court panel reversed their convictions based on its belief that the Budke’s first amendment rights had been infringed.
We affirm the reversal of the Budkes’ convictions for the reasons set forth in our opinion in State v. Newstrom, 371 N.W.2d 525 (Minn.1985). We do not reach the first amendment issues raised in this appeal.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Budke, 371 N.W.2d 533, 1985 Minn. LEXIS 1144 (Mich. 1985).
371 N.W.2d 533 (State v. Budke) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Newstrom
371 N.W.2d 525 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1985)