State v. Budke

Supreme Court of Minnesota

State v. Budke

371 N.W.2d 533, 1985 Minn. LEXIS 1144

CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota

DecidedJuly 19, 1985

DocketCX-84-211

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 371 N.W.2d 533 (State v. Budke) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Budke, 371 N.W.2d 533, 1985 Minn. LEXIS 1144 (Mich. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

WAHL, Justice.

Donald and Kathleen Budke were convicted of violating Minnesota’s compulsory school attendance law. On appeal, a three-judge district court panel reversed their convictions based on its belief that the Budke’s first amendment rights had been infringed.

We affirm the reversal of the Budkes’ convictions for the reasons set forth in our opinion in State v. Newstrom, 371 N.W.2d 525 (Minn.1985). We do not reach the first amendment issues raised in this appeal.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

WAHL, Justice.

Donald and Kathleen Budke were convicted of violating Minnesota’s compulsory school attendance law. On appeal, a three-judge district court panel reversed their convictions based on its belief that the Budke’s first amendment rights had been infringed.

We affirm the reversal of the Budkes’ convictions for the reasons set forth in our opinion in State v. Newstrom, 371 N.W.2d 525 (Minn.1985). We do not reach the first amendment issues raised in this appeal.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

371 N.W.2d 533, 1985 Minn. LEXIS 1144, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-budke-minn-1985.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack