State v. Buddy Gene Martin

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedApril 24, 2020
Docket13-19-00425-CR
StatusPublished

This text of State v. Buddy Gene Martin (State v. Buddy Gene Martin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Buddy Gene Martin, (Tex. Ct. App. 2020).

Opinion

NUMBER 13-19-00425-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellant,

v.

BUDDY GENE MARTIN, Appellee.

On appeal from the 156th District Court of Bee County, Texas.

ORDER OF ABATEMENT Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Longoria and Hinojosa Order Per Curiam

This appeal is before the Court on appellant’s motion to supplement the record to

include indictments, motions to continue, and dismissals from other criminal cases.

When a relevant item has been omitted from the clerk’s record, the appellate court

may by letter direct the trial court clerk to prepare, certify, and file in the appellate court a

supplemental clerk’s record containing the omitted item or items. See TEX. R. APP. P. 34.5(c)(1). Accordingly, the motion to supplement is hereby GRANTED and this appeal

is ABATED.

The trial court clerk of the 156th District Court of Bee County is directed to prepare

a supplemental appellate record in this case to include the following: from cause B-15-

2083-0-CR-B, the indictment and State’s Motion to Dismiss; from cause B-17-2072-0-CR-

B, the indictment, State’s Motion to Continue, and State’s Motion to Dismiss Without

Prejudice; from cause B-17-2073-0-CR-B the indictment, State’s Motion to Continue, and

State’s Motion to Dismiss without Prejudice; from cause B-17-2168-0-CR-B the

indictment, State’s Motion to Transfer Papers, State’s Motion to Dismiss without

Prejudice, and Defendant’s Response to State’s Motion to Dismiss. The 156th District

Court of Bee County is further directed to make findings whether the records requested

in appellant’s motion are relevant and necessary for purposes of this appeal. The

supplemental record shall be filed with this Court within 60 days from the date of this

order.

It is further ordered, this appeal will be reinstated upon receipt of the supplemental

clerk record, and Appellant’s brief is due thirty days after the supplemental record is filed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Delivered and filed the 24th day of April, 2020.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
State v. Buddy Gene Martin, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-buddy-gene-martin-texapp-2020.