State v. Buckley
266 S.W.3d 333, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1407, 2008 WL 4554398
Opinion
ORDER
John Buckley appeals the judgment entered upon a jury verdict convicting him as a co-conspirator in the sale of a controlled substance. We find no abuse of discretion by the trial court. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties with a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment under Rule 30.25(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Buckley, 266 S.W.3d 333, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1407, 2008 WL 4554398 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).
266 S.W.3d 333 (State v. Buckley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Smith
266 S.W.3d 333 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2008)