State v. Buckley

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Buckley

266 S.W.3d 333, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1407, 2008 WL 4554398

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedOctober 14, 2008

DocketED 90112

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 266 S.W.3d 333 (State v. Buckley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Buckley, 266 S.W.3d 333, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1407, 2008 WL 4554398 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

John Buckley appeals the judgment entered upon a jury verdict convicting him as a co-conspirator in the sale of a controlled substance. We find no abuse of discretion by the trial court. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties with a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment under Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

John Buckley appeals the judgment entered upon a jury verdict convicting him as a co-conspirator in the sale of a controlled substance. We find no abuse of discretion by the trial court. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties with a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment under Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

266 S.W.3d 333, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1407, 2008 WL 4554398, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-buckley-moctapp-2008.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack