State v. Buckholz

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Buckholz

505 S.W.3d 298, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 1277, 2016 WL 7209819

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 13, 2016·No. WD 79116·Published

Opinion

ORDER

Per Curiam:

Kenneth Buekholz (“Buekholz”) appeals the trial court’s decision to deny his 29.07(d) motion to withdraw his guilty plea. Buekholz argues that the trial court erred in sentencing him as an aggravated offender under Section 577.023 RSMo. Cum. Supp. 2000 because the State failed to establish the required prior convictions. In the alternative, the State argues that the plea court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion to withdraw his guilty [299] plea because the record supports the defendant’s conviction as an aggravated offender. We affirm. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

Per Curiam:

Kenneth Buekholz (“Buekholz”) appeals the trial court’s decision to deny his 29.07(d) motion to withdraw his guilty plea. Buekholz argues that the trial court erred in sentencing him as an aggravated offender under Section 577.023 RSMo. Cum. Supp. 2000 because the State failed to establish the required prior convictions. In the alternative, the State argues that the plea court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion to withdraw his guilty [299] plea because the record supports the defendant’s conviction as an aggravated offender. We affirm. Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Buckholz, 505 S.W.3d 298, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 1277, 2016 WL 7209819 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

505 S.W.3d 298 (State v. Buckholz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.