Home/Supreme Court of North Carolina/State v. . Buck

State v. . Buck

132 S.E. 151, 191 N.C. 528, 1926 N.C. LEXIS 115
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedMarch 31, 1926
StatusPublished
Cited by13 cases

This text of 132 S.E. 151 (State v. . Buck) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. . Buck, 132 S.E. 151, 191 N.C. 528, 1926 N.C. LEXIS 115 (N.C. 1926).

Opinion

Indictment charging violations of the prohibition statute. Verdict guilty. From judgment, defendant appealed. Assignments of error, based upon exceptions to the overruling by the court of objections to question, on the ground that same was leading, and of objections to testimony on the ground that same was in violation of the "hearsay" rule, cannot be sustained.

Whether counsel shall be permitted to ask a leading question, is within the discretion of the trial judge. The exercise of such discretion will not be reviewed on appeal. Crenshaw v. Johnson, 120 N.C. 270; Bank v. Carr,130 N.C. 481; S. v. Cobb, 164 N.C. 419; Howell v. Solomon, 167 N.C. 588. *Page 529

The testimony objected to was offered and admitted for the purpose of corroboration. His Honor was careful to so instruct the jury. Burnett v.Railroad, 120 N.C. 517; Belk v. Belk, 175 N.C. 69. The testimony of witness that he smelled the liquor in the can, and that it had the odor of whiskey was competent. S. v. Sigmon, 190 N.C. 684. There is

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Watkins
196 S.E.2d 750 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1973)
State v. Frazier
185 S.E.2d 652 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1972)
State v. Pearson
128 S.E.2d 251 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1962)
State v. May
102 S.E.2d 418 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1958)
State v. Tilley
79 S.E.2d 473 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1954)
State v. Cranfield
76 S.E.2d 353 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1953)
State v. . Beatty
40 S.E.2d 357 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1946)
State v. . Harris
22 S.E.2d 229 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1942)
State v. . Thomas
16 S.E.2d 399 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1941)
State v. . Hargrove
5 S.E.2d 852 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1939)
State v. . Coleman
2 S.E.2d 865 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1939)
State v. . Coffey
187 S.E. 754 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1936)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
132 S.E. 151, 191 N.C. 528, 1926 N.C. LEXIS 115, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-buck-nc-1926.