State v. Buck

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Buck

954 S.W.2d 13, 1997 WL 589179

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 23, 1997·No. No. 71300·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from the judgment entered on a jury verdict finding him guilty of one count of burglary in the second degree, in violation of section 569.130, RSMo 1994, and one count of stealing, in violation of section 570.030, RSMo 1994, on which he was sentenced to two consecutive ten-year sentences.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion reciting the detailed facts and reinstating the principles of law. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from the judgment entered on a jury verdict finding him guilty of one count of burglary in the second degree, in violation of section 569.130, RSMo 1994, and one count of stealing, in violation of section 570.030, RSMo 1994, on which he was sentenced to two consecutive ten-year sentences.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion reciting the detailed facts and reinstating the principles of law. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Buck, 954 S.W.2d 13, 1997 WL 589179 (Mo. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

954 S.W.2d 13 (State v. Buck) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related