State v. Buck

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

State v. Buck

46 Me. 531

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine·Decided July 1, 1859·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

The Court

held, that, notwithstanding only the collective value of the property alleged to have been stolen is stated in the indictment, yet, if the jury find the defendant guilty of stealing a part only of the property, and, in their verdict, [532] state the value of the articles so stolen by him, judgment may be well rendered upon such verdict.

Tenney, C. J., and Appleton, Cutting, May, Davis, and Kent, J. J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The Court

held, that, notwithstanding only the collective value of the property alleged to have been stolen is stated in the indictment, yet, if the jury find the defendant guilty of stealing a part only of the property, and, in their verdict, [532] state the value of the articles so stolen by him, judgment may be well rendered upon such verdict.

Tenney, C. J., and Appleton, Cutting, May, Davis, and Kent, J. J., concurred.

State v. Buck, 46 Me. 531 (Me. 1859).

Pincite

46 Me. 531 (State v. Buck) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related