State v. Buchanan
223 S.E.2d 161, 289 N.C. 452, 1976 N.C. LEXIS 1308
This text of 223 S.E.2d 161 (State v. Buchanan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State v. Buchanan, 223 S.E.2d 161, 289 N.C. 452, 1976 N.C. LEXIS 1308 (N.C. 1976).
Opinion
STATE of North Carolina
v.
Thomas Howell BUCHANAN.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Rufus L. Edmisten, Atty. Gen., Wilton E. Ragland, Associate Atty., for the State.
Swain, Leake & Henderson, for defendant.
Petition by the State for discretionary review under GS 7A-31, 28 N.C.App. 163, 220 S.E.2d 207. Denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
State v. Buchanan
220 S.E.2d 207 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1975)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
223 S.E.2d 161, 289 N.C. 452, 1976 N.C. LEXIS 1308, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-buchanan-nc-1976.