State v. Buchanan

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Buchanan

504 S.W.3d 87, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 799, 2016 WL 4435667

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedAugust 23, 2016

DocketNo. ED 102587

StatusPublished

This text of 504 S.W.3d 87 (State v. Buchanan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Buchanan, 504 S.W.3d 87, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 799, 2016 WL 4435667 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Myron Frederick Buchanan, Sr., appeals from the trial court’s judgment entered upon a jury verdict convicting him of one count each of first-degree statutory sodomy, first-degree child molestation, and furnishing or attempting to furnish pornographic material to a minor. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the trial court committed no plain error. Rule 30.20;¹ State v. Nylon, 311 S.W.3d 869, 884 (Mo. App. E.D. 2010). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Myron Frederick Buchanan, Sr., appeals from the trial court’s judgment entered upon a jury verdict convicting him of one count each of first-degree statutory sodomy, first-degree child molestation, and furnishing or attempting to furnish pornographic material to a minor. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the trial court committed no plain error. Rule 30.20;¹ State v. Nylon, 311 S.W.3d 869, 884 (Mo. App. E.D. 2010). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

504 S.W.3d 87, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 799, 2016 WL 4435667, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-buchanan-moctapp-2016.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack