State v. Buchanan

596 So. 2d 1294, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 4737, 1992 WL 86071
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 1, 1992
DocketNo. 91-1799
StatusPublished

This text of 596 So. 2d 1294 (State v. Buchanan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Buchanan, 596 So. 2d 1294, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 4737, 1992 WL 86071 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

Opinion

COWART, Judge.

The State appeals a downward departure sentence imposed as a resentencing. The defendant was convicted in each of two cases1 of dealing in stolen property (§ 812.-019, Fla.Stat.); a downward departure sentence was entered, appealed, reversed and remanded for a guidelines sentence. See State v. Buchanan, 580 So.2d 201 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991). On motion for rehearing in that case we (1) stated that a downward departure under the sentencing guidelines must be accompanied by written reasons notwithstanding that Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b) permits a downward modification without requiring a written reason, and (2) certified the question, see 580 So.2d at 202. The supreme court agreed, see Buchanan v. State, 592 So.2d 676 (Fla.1992).

At resentencing the trial court again entered a downward departure “conditional” “suspended” twelve year2 sentence. The State again appeals and we again vacate the sentence. Based on Pope v. State, 561 So.2d 554 (Fla.1990), upon reversal of the original downward departure sentences because they were not then supported by written reasons, the trial court was required to impose guidelines sentences in compliance with this court’s mandate. Accordingly, the downward departure sentence in the two cases involving dealing in stolen property are vacated and the cause is remanded with directions that the trial court impose a sentence consistent with the sentencing guidelines relating to recommended and permitted sentences.

SENTENCES VACATED; CAUSE REMANDED FOR RESENTENCING.

COBB and W. SHARP, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Shieder v. State
430 So. 2d 537 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)
Poore v. State
531 So. 2d 161 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1988)
State v. Buchanan
580 So. 2d 201 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)
Pope v. State
561 So. 2d 554 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1990)
Buchanan v. State
592 So. 2d 676 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
596 So. 2d 1294, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 4737, 1992 WL 86071, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-buchanan-fladistctapp-1992.