State v. Brye

Supreme Court of Connecticut

State v. Brye

661 A.2d 97, 234 Conn. 916

Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided July 10, 1995·No. SC 15296·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 37 Conn. App. 914 (AC 13254), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Was the Appellate Court correct in holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in failing to order [917] a new trial when during jury deliberations several jurors made allegedly improper remarks about the defendant who is African-American?”

The Supreme Court docket number is SC 15296. Decided July 10, 1995 Richard M. Maraño, special public defender, in support of the petition. Leah Hawley, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 37 Conn. App. 914 (AC 13254), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Was the Appellate Court correct in holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in failing to order [917] a new trial when during jury deliberations several jurors made allegedly improper remarks about the defendant who is African-American?”

The Supreme Court docket number is SC 15296. Decided July 10, 1995 Richard M. Maraño, special public defender, in support of the petition. Leah Hawley, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.

State v. Brye, 661 A.2d 97, 234 Conn. 916 (Colo. 1995).

Pincite

661 A.2d 97 (State v. Brye) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related