State v. Bryant

Court of Appeals of Oregon

State v. Bryant

670 P.2d 238, 65 Or. App. 221, 1983 Ore. App. LEXIS 3858

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedOctober 19, 1983

DocketC 82-08-36562; CA A26874

StatusPublished

This text of 670 P.2d 238 (State v. Bryant) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Bryant, 670 P.2d 238, 65 Or. App. 221, 1983 Ore. App. LEXIS 3858 (Or. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

This is a criminal case in which defendant appeals his conviction for promoting prostitution. He assigns as error the court’s admission over timely objection of certain hearsay testimony from two police officers. The state confesses that, if the exceptions taken by defendant to the admission of that evidence were adequate, the court erred. We find the exceptions adequate. The state argues, in the alternative, that the error was harmless, but we hold otherwise.

Reversed and remanded for a new trial.¹

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

This is a criminal case in which defendant appeals his conviction for promoting prostitution. He assigns as error the court’s admission over timely objection of certain hearsay testimony from two police officers. The state confesses that, if the exceptions taken by defendant to the admission of that evidence were adequate, the court erred. We find the exceptions adequate. The state argues, in the alternative, that the error was harmless, but we hold otherwise.

Reversed and remanded for a new trial.¹

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

670 P.2d 238, 65 Or. App. 221, 1983 Ore. App. LEXIS 3858, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-bryant-orctapp-1983.