State v. Bryant

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

State v. Bryant

180 S.E.2d 457, 11 N.C. App. 208, 1971 N.C. App. LEXIS 1492

CourtCourt of Appeals of North Carolina

DecidedApril 28, 1971

DocketNo. 7126SC241

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 180 S.E.2d 457 (State v. Bryant) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Bryant, 180 S.E.2d 457, 11 N.C. App. 208, 1971 N.C. App. LEXIS 1492 (N.C. Ct. App. 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

BRITT, Judge.

The findings of Judge Copeland that defendant had violated the conditions of her probation are fully supported by the evidence. In fact, at the hearing defendant testified and admitted that she failed to report to her probation officer as instructed and that she was convicted of shoplifting after being placed on probation. The findings of fact fully support the order and judgment and no abuse of the court’s discretion is shown. Judge Copeland acted in conformity with established procedure. State v. Duncan, 270 N.C. 241, 154 S.E. 2d 53 (1967); State v. Hewett, 270 N.C. 348, 154 S.E. 2d 476 (1967).

The judgment appealed from is

Affirmed.

Judges Campbell and Graham concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BRITT, Judge.

The findings of Judge Copeland that defendant had violated the conditions of her probation are fully supported by the evidence. In fact, at the hearing defendant testified and admitted that she failed to report to her probation officer as instructed and that she was convicted of shoplifting after being placed on probation. The findings of fact fully support the order and judgment and no abuse of the court’s discretion is shown. Judge Copeland acted in conformity with established procedure. State v. Duncan, 270 N.C. 241, 154 S.E. 2d 53 (1967); State v. Hewett, 270 N.C. 348, 154 S.E. 2d 476 (1967).

The judgment appealed from is

Affirmed.

Judges Campbell and Graham concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

180 S.E.2d 457, 11 N.C. App. 208, 1971 N.C. App. LEXIS 1492, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-bryant-ncctapp-1971.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack