State v. Bryant

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

State v. Bryant

180 S.E.2d 457, 11 N.C. App. 208, 1971 N.C. App. LEXIS 1492

Court of Appeals of North Carolina·Decided April 28, 1971·No. No. 7126SC241·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

BRITT, Judge.

The findings of Judge Copeland that defendant had violated the conditions of her probation are fully supported by the evidence. In fact, at the hearing defendant testified and admitted that she failed to report to her probation officer as instructed and that she was convicted of shoplifting after being placed on probation. The findings of fact fully support the order and judgment and no abuse of the court’s discretion is shown. Judge Copeland acted in conformity with established procedure. State v. Duncan, 270 N.C. 241, 154 S.E. 2d 53 (1967); State v. Hewett, 270 N.C. 348, 154 S.E. 2d 476 (1967).

The judgment appealed from is

Affirmed.

Judges Campbell and Graham concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BRITT, Judge.

The findings of Judge Copeland that defendant had violated the conditions of her probation are fully supported by the evidence. In fact, at the hearing defendant testified and admitted that she failed to report to her probation officer as instructed and that she was convicted of shoplifting after being placed on probation. The findings of fact fully support the order and judgment and no abuse of the court’s discretion is shown. Judge Copeland acted in conformity with established procedure. State v. Duncan, 270 N.C. 241, 154 S.E. 2d 53 (1967); State v. Hewett, 270 N.C. 348, 154 S.E. 2d 476 (1967).

The judgment appealed from is

Affirmed.

Judges Campbell and Graham concur.

State v. Bryant, 180 S.E.2d 457, 11 N.C. App. 208, 1971 N.C. App. LEXIS 1492 (N.C. Ct. App. 1971).

Pincite

180 S.E.2d 457 (State v. Bryant) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related