State v. Bryant

Montana Supreme Court

State v. Bryant

210 Mont. 8

CourtMontana Supreme Court

DecidedJanuary 6, 1984

DocketNo. DC-82-363

StatusPublished

This text of 210 Mont. 8 (State v. Bryant) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Montana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Bryant, 210 Mont. 8 (Mo. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

DECISION

The application of the above-named defendant for a review of the sentence of 8 [9]*9years with 2 years suspended; concurrent with DC-82-050 imposed on February 16, 1983 was fully heard and after a careful consideration of the entire matter it is decided that: the sentence shall be amended to 6 years with 3 years suspended; to be served concurrently with DC-82-050, and the Defendant shall be under the Supervision of the Department of Adult Probation and Parole for the suspended portion of this sentence.

DATED this 6th day of January, 1984.

Reasons for the amendment are:

(1) Lack of pre-sentence report;

(2) No disposition as to what sentences the Co-Defendants received.

This amendment brings the sentence more in line with other crimes of a similar nature.

We wish to thank Paul Sharkey of the Montana Defender Project for his assistance to the Defendant and to this Court.

SENTENCE REVIEW DIVISION Joseph B. Gary, Mark P. Sullivan, John S. Henson

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DECISION

The application of the above-named defendant for a review of the sentence of 8 [9]*9years with 2 years suspended; concurrent with DC-82-050 imposed on February 16, 1983 was fully heard and after a careful consideration of the entire matter it is decided that: the sentence shall be amended to 6 years with 3 years suspended; to be served concurrently with DC-82-050, and the Defendant shall be under the Supervision of the Department of Adult Probation and Parole for the suspended portion of this sentence.

DATED this 6th day of January, 1984.

Reasons for the amendment are:

(1) Lack of pre-sentence report;

(2) No disposition as to what sentences the Co-Defendants received.

This amendment brings the sentence more in line with other crimes of a similar nature.

We wish to thank Paul Sharkey of the Montana Defender Project for his assistance to the Defendant and to this Court.

SENTENCE REVIEW DIVISION Joseph B. Gary, Mark P. Sullivan, John S. Henson

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

210 Mont. 8, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-bryant-mont-1984.