State v. Bryant

373 So. 2d 708
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 31, 1979
Docket78-1959
StatusPublished
Cited by10 cases

This text of 373 So. 2d 708 (State v. Bryant) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Bryant, 373 So. 2d 708 (Fla. Ct. App. 1979).

Opinion

373 So.2d 708 (1979)

The STATE of Florida, Appellant,
v.
Anthony BRYANT, Appellee.

No. 78-1959.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

July 31, 1979.

Janet Reno, State's Atty. and Milton Robbins, Asst. State's Atty., for appellant.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Warren S. Schwartz, Asst. Public Defender and Eliot Gersten, Legal Intern, for appellee.

Before PEARSON, KEHOE and SCHWARTZ, JJ.

KEHOE, Judge.

Appellant, the prosecution below, brings this appeal from an order of the trial court *709 dismissing, pursuant to appellee's defendant below, motion to dismiss under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.190(c)(4), a two count information against appellee charging him with aggravated assault, and carrying a concealed weapon. We reverse.

In regard to the count of aggravated assault, we believe that the trial court erred by granting the motion to dismiss because there were justiciable issues of facts which, if construed most favorably to appellant, raised a prima facie case of guilt. The trial court may not either weigh the evidence or determine its creditability. See State v. Davis, 243 So.2d 587 (Fla. 1971); and Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.190.

In regard to the count of carrying a concealed weapon, under Section 790.01(2), Florida Statutes (1977), the trial court improperly relied upon Section 790.25(3)(1), Florida Statutes (1977), in granting the motion to dismiss. This latter Section pertains to an exception for carrying an unlicensed weapon and is not a defense to carrying a concealed weapon.

For the reasons set forth above, the order appealed is reversed and the cause remanded for further proceedings.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Commons
592 So. 2d 317 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)
Smith v. State
543 So. 2d 325 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
State v. Carda
495 So. 2d 912 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)
State v. Sanchez
490 So. 2d 1373 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)
Cockin v. State
453 So. 2d 189 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)
State v. Williams
410 So. 2d 1380 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)
Cates v. State
408 So. 2d 797 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)
State v. Sheppard
401 So. 2d 944 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)
State v. Hudson
397 So. 2d 426 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
373 So. 2d 708, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-bryant-fladistctapp-1979.