State v. Bruzaitus

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Bruzaitus

880 S.W.2d 332, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 906, 1994 WL 240995

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 7, 1994·No. Nos. 61980, 64047·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

A jury convicted defendant of one count of possession of a controlled substance and one count of unlawful use of a weapon, in violation of §§ 195.202 and 571.030.1(4), RSMo Cum Supp.1993. Also, it convicted him of one count of resisting arrest, in violation of § 575.150, RSMo 1986.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgments are affirmed in accordance with Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

A jury convicted defendant of one count of possession of a controlled substance and one count of unlawful use of a weapon, in violation of §§ 195.202 and 571.030.1(4), RSMo Cum Supp.1993. Also, it convicted him of one count of resisting arrest, in violation of § 575.150, RSMo 1986.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgments are affirmed in accordance with Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).

State v. Bruzaitus, 880 S.W.2d 332, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 906, 1994 WL 240995 (Mo. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

880 S.W.2d 332 (State v. Bruzaitus) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.