State v. BRUTCHER

248 S.W.3d 66, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 97, 2008 WL 170501
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedJanuary 22, 2008
DocketED 88737
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 248 S.W.3d 66 (State v. BRUTCHER) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. BRUTCHER, 248 S.W.3d 66, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 97, 2008 WL 170501 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

George Brutcher appeals the judgment entered upon a jury verdict convicting him of two counts of burglary in the first degree, five counts of armed criminal action, and one count each of felonious restraint, resisting arrest, assault on a police officer in the second degree, Class A assault in the first degree, Class B assault in the first degree, victim tampering, and unlawful use of a weapon. We find that the trial court did not err in denying Bratcher’s motion to strike for cause, denying his motion to sever some charges or dismiss for improper joinder, admitting certain out-of-court statements, or permitting the State to instruct the jury on its charge of victim tampering.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Carter v. TREASURER STATE OF MISSOURI
248 S.W.3d 66 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
248 S.W.3d 66, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 97, 2008 WL 170501, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-brutcher-moctapp-2008.