State v. Brunson
1 Root 307
This text of 1 Root 307 (State v. Brunson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State v. Brunson, 1 Root 307 (Colo. 1791).
Opinion
[308]*308In an information v. B. Howard, for a forgery; Bradway, in whose name the note was forged, was not admitted to testify, although the note had been found by judgment of court not to be his note. Windham, March Term, 1789.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Lyon v. Lyman
9 Conn. 63 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1831)
People v. Dean
6 Cow. 27 (New York Supreme Court, 1826)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
1 Root 307, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-brunson-conn-1791.