State v. Brunson
1 Root 307
Opinion
[308]*308In an information v. B. Howard, for a forgery; Bradway, in whose name the note was forged, was not admitted to testify, although the note had been found by judgment of court not to be his note. Windham, March Term, 1789.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Brunson, 1 Root 307 (Colo. 1791).
1 Root 307 (State v. Brunson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Lyon v. Lyman
9 Conn. 63 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1831)
People v. Dean
6 Cow. 27 (New York Supreme Court, 1826)