State v. Bruno
This text of 428 S.E.2d 185 (State v. Bruno) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
STATE of North Carolina
v.
Charles Samuel BRUNO.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Nora Henry Hargrove, Wilmington, for defendant.
Valerie B. Spalding, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jerry Lee Spivey, Dist. Atty., for the State.
Prior report: 108 N.C.App. 401, 424 S.E.2d 440.
ORDER
Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by the Defendant in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30, and the motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question filed by the Attorney General; and upon consideration of the petition for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by Defendant pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the motion to dismiss the appeal is
"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 11th day of March 1993."
The Petition for Discretionary Review is:
"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 11th day of March 1993."
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
428 S.E.2d 185, 333 N.C. 464, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-bruno-nc-1993.