State v. Bruno

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State v. Bruno

610 So. 2d 807, 1993 La. LEXIS 130, 1993 WL 10226

Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided January 15, 1993·No. No. 92-KH-0002·Published

Opinion

In re Bruno, Wilbert; — Defendant(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writ; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “J”, No. 286-913.

Granted. The district court is ordered to grant relator an out-of-time appeal and appoint counsel to handle the appeal on relator’s behalf. See Lofton v. Whitley, 905 F.2d 885 (5th Cir.1990); State ex rel. Deverney v. Whitley, 597 So.2d 1020 (La.1992); State v. Robinson, 590 So.2d 1185 (La.1992). If appointed counsel, after reviewing the record, finds no basis for assigning error on appeal, he may follow the proce[808] dure outlined in State v. Benjamin, 573 So.2d 528 (La.App. 4th Cir.1990).

KIMBALL, J., not on panel.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Bruno, Wilbert; — Defendant(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writ; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “J”, No. 286-913.

Granted. The district court is ordered to grant relator an out-of-time appeal and appoint counsel to handle the appeal on relator’s behalf. See Lofton v. Whitley, 905 F.2d 885 (5th Cir.1990); State ex rel. Deverney v. Whitley, 597 So.2d 1020 (La.1992); State v. Robinson, 590 So.2d 1185 (La.1992). If appointed counsel, after reviewing the record, finds no basis for assigning error on appeal, he may follow the proce[808] dure outlined in State v. Benjamin, 573 So.2d 528 (La.App. 4th Cir.1990).

KIMBALL, J., not on panel.

State v. Bruno, 610 So. 2d 807, 1993 La. LEXIS 130, 1993 WL 10226 (La. 1993).

Pincite

610 So. 2d 807 (State v. Bruno) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related