State v. Bruno

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State v. Bruno

112 So. 304, 163 La. 476, 1927 La. LEXIS 1947

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedMarch 28, 1927

DocketNo. 28440.

StatusPublished

This text of 112 So. 304 (State v. Bruno) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Bruno, 112 So. 304, 163 La. 476, 1927 La. LEXIS 1947 (La. 1927).

Pincite

Opinion

OVERTON, J.

Defendant appeals from a conviction and sentence for having violated Act 41 of 1924, by having in his possession cigarettes containing the dried form of the Mexican plant, known as Marajuana. The record contains neither a bill of exceptions nor an assignment of errors, and no error appears on the face of the record. Under these circumstances, there *477 remains nothing to do but to affirm the verdict and the sentence from which the appeal is taken.

The verdict and the sentence appealed from are therefore affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OVERTON, J.

Defendant appeals from a conviction and sentence for having violated Act 41 of 1924, by having in his possession cigarettes containing the dried form of the Mexican plant, known as Marajuana. The record contains neither a bill of exceptions nor an assignment of errors, and no error appears on the face of the record. Under these circumstances, there *477 remains nothing to do but to affirm the verdict and the sentence from which the appeal is taken.

The verdict and the sentence appealed from are therefore affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

112 So. 304, 163 La. 476, 1927 La. LEXIS 1947, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-bruno-la-1927.