Home/Ohio Supreme Court/State v. Bruggeman

State v. Bruggeman

659 N.E.2d 312, 74 Ohio St. 3d 1497, 1996 Ohio LEXIS 2681
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 12, 1996
Docket95-2021
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 659 N.E.2d 312 (State v. Bruggeman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Bruggeman, 659 N.E.2d 312, 74 Ohio St. 3d 1497, 1996 Ohio LEXIS 2681 (Ohio 1996).

Opinion

Auglaize County, No. 2-94-1. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Auglaize County. It appears from the records of this court that appellant has not filed a merit brief or notice of adoption, due on or before November 13, 1995, in compliance with the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court and therefore has failed to prosecute this cause with the requisite diligence. Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed sua sponte, effective January 11, 1996.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Bruggeman, Unpublished Decision (3-7-2005)
2005 Ohio 956 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
659 N.E.2d 312, 74 Ohio St. 3d 1497, 1996 Ohio LEXIS 2681, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-bruggeman-ohio-1996.