State v. Bruegger
This text of 327 S.W.3d 629 (State v. Bruegger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
Christopher Bruegger (Appellant) appeals from the trial court’s judgment entered upon a jury verdict finding him guilty of five counts of sécond-degree statutory sodomy and two counts of second-degree child molestation. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in allowing the prosecutor’s line of questioning. State v. Tokar, 918 S.W.2d 753, 770 (Mo.banc 1996). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision *630 to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
327 S.W.3d 629, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1731, 2010 WL 5174508, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-bruegger-moctapp-2010.