State v. Bruce
This text of 351 A.2d 896 (State v. Bruce) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER OF COURT
The petition for writ of certiorari having been granted and heard and it appearing that the petition was improvidently granted, it is this 1st day of March, 1976
ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the writ of certiorari be, and it is hereby, dismissed with costs to be paid by the State of Maryland.
In dismissing this petition as improvidently granted we point out that even assuming the respondent, when he failed to retain counsel, was financially able to employ an attorney, and further assuming that he thereby waived or attempted-to waive his right to the assistance of counsel, the record does not reflect compliance with Maryland Rule 719, particularly subsections b 1 and c, as mandated by subsection f of that Rule.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
351 A.2d 896, 277 Md. 92, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-bruce-md-1976.