State v. Bruce

351 A.2d 896, 277 Md. 92
Court of Appeals of Maryland·Decided March 1, 1976·No. No. 74·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

ORDER OF COURT

The petition for writ of certiorari having been granted and heard and it appearing that the petition was improvidently granted, it is this 1st day of March, 1976

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the writ of certiorari be, and it is hereby, dismissed with costs to be paid by the State of Maryland.

In dismissing this petition as improvidently granted we point out that even assuming the respondent, when he failed to retain counsel, was financially able to employ an attorney, and further assuming that he thereby waived or attempted-to waive his right to the assistance of counsel, the record does not reflect compliance with Maryland Rule 719, particularly subsections b 1 and c, as mandated by subsection f of that Rule.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Bruce, 351 A.2d 896, 277 Md. 92 (Md. 1976).

351 A.2d 896 (State v. Bruce) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Nikander v. District Court In & For the First Judicial District
711 P.2d 1260 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1986)
Nikander v. DIST. CT. IN & FOR FIRST JUD. DIST.
711 P.2d 1260 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1986)