State v. Bruce

Supreme Court of Florida

State v. Bruce

14 So. 3d 220, 34 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 438, 2009 Fla. LEXIS 1013, 2009 WL 1955309

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided July 9, 2009·No. SC08-2127·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We initially accepted jurisdiction in the case of Bruce v. State, 993 So.2d 155 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008), in which the First District Court of Appeal ruled upon a question certified to be of great public importance. See art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. Having-considered the First District’s opinion and the briefs of the parties, upon further review, we have determined that we should exercise our discretion and discharge jurisdiction. Accordingly, we hereby dismiss review.

It is so ordered.

QUINCE, C.J., and PARIENTE, LEWIS, POLSTON, LABARGA, and PERRY, JJ., concur. CANADY, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We initially accepted jurisdiction in the case of Bruce v. State, 993 So.2d 155 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008), in which the First District Court of Appeal ruled upon a question certified to be of great public importance. See art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. Having-considered the First District’s opinion and the briefs of the parties, upon further review, we have determined that we should exercise our discretion and discharge jurisdiction. Accordingly, we hereby dismiss review.

It is so ordered.

QUINCE, C.J., and PARIENTE, LEWIS, POLSTON, LABARGA, and PERRY, JJ., concur. CANADY, J., dissents.

State v. Bruce, 14 So. 3d 220, 34 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 438, 2009 Fla. LEXIS 1013, 2009 WL 1955309 (Fla. 2009).

Pincite

14 So. 3d 220 (State v. Bruce) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related