State v. Browning

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Browning

529 S.W.3d 924

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 3, 2017·No. ED 104768·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Preston Browning (“Defendant”) appeals his conviction for one count of driving while intoxicated, in violation of Section 577.010, and one count of property damage in the first-degree, in violation of Section 569.100. We find no error and affirm the judgment of conviction.

The judgment of the trial court is not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting [925] forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Preston Browning (“Defendant”) appeals his conviction for one count of driving while intoxicated, in violation of Section 577.010, and one count of property damage in the first-degree, in violation of Section 569.100. We find no error and affirm the judgment of conviction.

The judgment of the trial court is not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting [925] forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Browning, 529 S.W.3d 924 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

529 S.W.3d 924 (State v. Browning) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.