State v. Browne

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Browne

467 S.W.3d 406, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 775, 2015 WL 4600381

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided July 31, 2015·No. No. ED 102359·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

The State of Missouri brings this interlocutory appeal after the trial court sustained defendant Robert Eugene Browne’s motion to suppress items seized during a search of his home. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have furnished the parties with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM

The State of Missouri brings this interlocutory appeal after the trial court sustained defendant Robert Eugene Browne’s motion to suppress items seized during a search of his home. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have furnished the parties with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm. Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Browne, 467 S.W.3d 406, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 775, 2015 WL 4600381 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

467 S.W.3d 406 (State v. Browne) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.