State v. Brown
This text of 247 P.3d 420 (State v. Brown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
STATE of Washington, Respondent,
v.
Maurice Terrell BROWN, Petitioner.
Supreme Court of Washington.
ORDER
¶ 1 Department I of the Court, composed of Chief Justice Madsen and Justices C. Johnson, Chambers, Fairhurst and Stephens, considered at its February 1, 2011, Motion Calendar, whether review should be granted pursuant to RAP 13.4(b), and unanimously agreed that the following order be entered.
¶ 2 IT IS ORDERED:
¶ 3 That the Petition for Review is granted only on the issue of the special verdict unanimity instruction and this case is remanded to the Court of Appeals Division Three for reconsideration in light of State v. Baskaw, 169 Wash.2d 133, 234 P.3d 195 (2010).
/s/ Madsen, C.J. CHIEF JUSTICEFree access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
247 P.3d 420, 170 Wash. 2d 1025, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-brown-wash-2011.