State v. Brown

247 P.3d 420, 170 Wash. 2d 1025
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Brown. Read the opinion of the Court — 169 Wash. 2d 195
Washington Supreme Court·Decided February 1, 2011·No. 83211-1·Published

Opinion

247 P.3d 420 (2011)
170 Wash.2d 1025

STATE of Washington, Respondent,
v.
Maurice Terrell BROWN, Petitioner.

No. 83211-1.

Supreme Court of Washington.

February 1, 2011.

ORDER

¶ 1 Department I of the Court, composed of Chief Justice Madsen and Justices C. Johnson, Chambers, Fairhurst and Stephens, considered at its February 1, 2011, Motion Calendar, whether review should be granted pursuant to RAP 13.4(b), and unanimously agreed that the following order be entered.

¶ 2 IT IS ORDERED:

¶ 3 That the Petition for Review is granted only on the issue of the special verdict unanimity instruction and this case is remanded to the Court of Appeals Division Three for reconsideration in light of State v. Baskaw, 169 Wash.2d 133, 234 P.3d 195 (2010).

/s/ Madsen, C.J. CHIEF JUSTICE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Brown, 247 P.3d 420, 170 Wash. 2d 1025 (Wash. 2011).

247 P.3d 420 (State v. Brown) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Bashaw
234 P.3d 195 (Washington Supreme Court, 2010)
State v. Contreras
249 P.3d 181 (Washington Supreme Court, 2011)
State v. Bashaw
169 Wash. 2d 133 (Washington Supreme Court, 2010)