State v. Brown

CourtCourt of Appeals of South Carolina
DecidedJune 1, 2016
Docket2016-UP-244
StatusUnpublished

This text of State v. Brown (State v. Brown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Brown, (S.C. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinion

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Jonathan Brown, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2014-001554

Appeal From Dorchester County Maité Murphy, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2016-UP-244 Submitted June 1, 2016 – Filed June 1, 2016

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Lara Mary Caudy, of Columbia, and Jonathan Brown, pro se, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General John Benjamin Aplin, both of Columbia, for Respondent. PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.1

APPEAL DISMISSED.

HUFF, A.C.J., and WILLIAMS and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

1 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
State v. Brown, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-brown-scctapp-2016.