State v. Brown

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

State v. Brown

DecidedFebruary 9, 2005

Docket2005-UP-096

StatusUnpublished

This text of State v. Brown (State v. Brown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Brown, (S.C. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Thomas Edward Brown, Appellant.

Appeal From Richland County
Alexander S. Macaulay, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2005-UP-096
Submitted February 1, 2005 Filed February 9, 2005

APPEAL DISMISSED

Assistant Appellate Defender Tara S. Taggart, Office of Appellate Defense, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, Office of the Attorney General, of Columbia; and Solicitor Warren Blair Giese, all of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Thomas Edward Brown was indicted for and convicted of assault and battery with intent to kill. The trial court sentenced him to fifteen years imprisonment. Browns counsel attached to the final brief a petition to be relieved as counsel stating she had reviewed the record and concluded the appeal lacked merit. Brown did file a pro se response. We dismiss pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991). Counsels petition to be relieved is granted.1

APPEAL DISMISSED.

GOOLSBY, HUFF, and STILWELL JJ. concur.

1 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Thomas Edward Brown, Appellant.

Appeal From Richland County
Alexander S. Macaulay, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2005-UP-096
Submitted February 1, 2005 Filed February 9, 2005

APPEAL DISMISSED

Assistant Appellate Defender Tara S. Taggart, Office of Appellate Defense, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, Office of the Attorney General, of Columbia; and Solicitor Warren Blair Giese, all of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Thomas Edward Brown was indicted for and convicted of assault and battery with intent to kill. The trial court sentenced him to fifteen years imprisonment. Browns counsel attached to the final brief a petition to be relieved as counsel stating she had reviewed the record and concluded the appeal lacked merit. Brown did file a pro se response. We dismiss pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991). Counsels petition to be relieved is granted.1

APPEAL DISMISSED.

GOOLSBY, HUFF, and STILWELL JJ. concur.

1 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

State v. Brown, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-brown-scctapp-2005.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack