State v. Brown

867 N.E.2d 843, 114 Ohio St. 3d 1409
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided June 6, 2007·No. 2007-0184·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Cuyahoga App. No. 87651, 2006-Ohio-6267. Discretionary appeal accepted on Proposition of Law Nos. I and II.

Pfeifer, O’Donnell and Lanzinger, JJ., dissent.

Discretionary cross-appeal accepted on Proposition of Law No. VI and held for the decision in 2006-0151, State v. Carswell, Warren App. No. CA2005-04-047, 2005-Ohio-6547; and briefing schedule stayed.

Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor and Cupp, JJ., would also accept the cross-appeal on Proposition of Law No. III. Pfeifer and Lanzinger, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Brown, 867 N.E.2d 843, 114 Ohio St. 3d 1409 (Ohio 2007).

867 N.E.2d 843 (State v. Brown) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Brown
895 N.E.2d 149 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2008)