State v. Brown
This text of 2014 ND 108 (State v. Brown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Filed 5/28/14 by Clerk of Supreme Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
2014 ND 108
State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee
v.
Alex Raymond Brown, Defendant and Appellant
No. 20130401
Appeal from the District Court of McLean County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable Gail Hagerty, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Ladd Ronald Erickson, State’s Attorney, P.O. Box 1108, Washburn, ND 58577-1108, for plaintiff and appellee; submitted on brief.
Kent M. Morrow, 411 North 4th Street, P.O. Box 2155, Bismarck, ND 58502-
2155, for defendant and appellant; submitted on brief.
State v. Brown
[¶1] Alex Raymond Brown appeals from a district court judgment of conviction after a jury trial for delivery of a controlled substance and possession of a controlled substance with intent to deliver. Brown argues the district court erred in denying his motion for judgment of acquittal because insufficient evidence supported the guilty verdicts. We conclude sufficient evidence supports the verdict. We summarily affirm the district court’s denial of Brown’s motion for judgment of acquittal and judgment of conviction under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3).
[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Daniel J. Crothers
Lisa Fair McEvers
Carol Ronning Kapsner
William A. Neumann, S.J.
[¶3] The Honorable William A. Neumann, S.J., sitting in place of Sandstrom, J., disqualified.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2014 ND 108, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-brown-nd-2014.