Home/Court of Appeals of North Carolina/State v. Brown

State v. Brown

221 S.E.2d 74, 28 N.C. App. 355, 1976 N.C. App. LEXIS 2690
CourtCourt of Appeals of North Carolina
DecidedJanuary 7, 1976
DocketNo. 7514SC685
StatusPublished

This text of 221 S.E.2d 74 (State v. Brown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Brown, 221 S.E.2d 74, 28 N.C. App. 355, 1976 N.C. App. LEXIS 2690 (N.C. Ct. App. 1976).

Opinion

MARTIN, Judge.

No briefs have been filed, nor was oral argument undertaken. Exceptions in the record not set out in appellant’s brief, or in support of which no reason or argument is stated or authority cited, will be taken as abandoned by him. Rule 28, Rules of Practice in the Court of Appeals of North Carolina. Failure by appellant to file a brief works an abandonment of his assignments of error, except those appearing upon the face of the record proper, which are cognizable ex mero motu. State v. Dockery, 23 N.C. App. 554, 209 S.E. 2d 339 (1974).

Error does not appear upon the face of the record.

No error.

Judges Vaughn and Clark concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Dockery
209 S.E.2d 339 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1974)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
221 S.E.2d 74, 28 N.C. App. 355, 1976 N.C. App. LEXIS 2690, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-brown-ncctapp-1976.