State v. Brown
This text of 75 S.E.2d 108 (State v. Brown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
There is nothing on tbe record before us to indicate any vagueness or irregularity by tbe grand jury in returning tbe bill of indictment as “A True Bill.” Moreover, where a defendant is charged with a felony and pleads guilty to a misdemeanor, bis motion in arrest' of judgment for defect in the indictment charging tbe felony cannot be sustained. Tbe sentence in such cases is based upon the defendant’s voluntary plea and not upon tbe indictment for a felony. S. v. Ray, 212 N.C. 748, 194 S.E. 472; S. v. McKeon, 223 N.C. 404, 26 S.E. 2d 914.
Tbe judgment below is
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
75 S.E.2d 108, 237 N.C. 439, 1953 N.C. LEXIS 529, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-brown-nc-1953.