State v. Brown

77 S.E.2d 627, 238 N.C. 260, 1953 N.C. LEXIS 412
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided September 23, 1953·No. 78·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The only assignment of error presented by defendant for decision on this appeal is based upon exceptions to rulings of the trial court in denying her motions, aptly made, for judgment as of nonsuit. As to this, it is sufficient to say that the evidence offered by the State is enough to take the case to the jury on the question of constructive possession by defendant of nontax-paid whiskey, and to support the verdict returned by the jury.

Possession of nontax-paid whiskey in any quantity anywhere in the State is unlawful. G.S. 18-48. S. v. Barnhardt, 230 N.C. 223, 52 S.E. 2d 904; also S. v. Parker, 234 N.C. 236, 66 S.E. 2d 907. And possession, within the meaning of the statute, may be either actual or constructive. See S. v. Webb, 233 N.C. 382, 64 S.E. 2d 268, and cases cited; also S. v. Parker, supra, and cases cited.

Hence in the judgment from which this appeal is taken, there is found

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Brown, 77 S.E.2d 627, 238 N.C. 260, 1953 N.C. LEXIS 412 (N.C. 1953).

77 S.E.2d 627 (State v. Brown) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Leach
158 S.E.2d 782 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1968)
State v. Guffey
112 S.E.2d 734 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1960)
State v. Cofield
100 S.E.2d 355 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1957)
State v. Ferguson
78 S.E.2d 911 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1953)