State v. . Brown

64 S.E. 775, 150 N.C. 867, 1909 N.C. LEXIS 175
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedMay 21, 1909
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 64 S.E. 775 (State v. . Brown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. . Brown, 64 S.E. 775, 150 N.C. 867, 1909 N.C. LEXIS 175 (N.C. 1909).

Opinion

Per Curiam :

The motion was properly overruled.

1. The act of the General Assembly of 4907 (chapter 573) creating a recorder’s court for the city of Winston limits the jurisdiction of tbat court to offenses committed within the corporate limits of said city, and there is nothing appearing upbn the face of tbis record showing tbat the offense, was committed within those limits.

2. Larceny from tbe person, regardless of tbe value of tbe property, is neither a petty misdemeanor nor a felony, tbe punishment for which cannot exceed one year, under section 8506 of tbe Revisal.

The punishment for such offense, under sections 3500 and 3506, may be as much as ten years in tbe State’s Prison. Of tbis offense tbe Superior Court has exclusive jurisdiction.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Benfield
179 S.E.2d 388 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1971)
State v. Massey
161 S.E.2d 103 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1968)
State v. Stevens
113 S.E.2d 577 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1960)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
64 S.E. 775, 150 N.C. 867, 1909 N.C. LEXIS 175, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-brown-nc-1909.