State v. . Brown
10 S.E. 870, 106 N.C. 645
Opinion
There is no statement of case on appeal, no assignment of error, and, upon a careful inspection of the record, no error appears.
The bill of indictment is substantially in the form authorized by ch. 58, Acts of 1887, albeit it contains some expressions not required by it, and which are mere surplusage. The validity of that act, and the sufficiency of an indictment drawn in accordance with it, were sustained by this Court in State v. Moore, 104 N. C., 743. We cite that case and affirm it as to this point.
No error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. . Brown, 10 S.E. 870, 106 N.C. 645 (N.C. 1890).
10 S.E. 870 (State v. . Brown) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Lowe
247 S.E.2d 878 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1978)
State v. . Southerland
100 S.E. 187 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1919)
State v. . Williams
23 S.E. 250 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1895)
State v. . Arnold
11 S.E. 990 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1890)