State v. . Brown

Supreme Court of North Carolina

State v. . Brown

10 S.E. 870, 106 N.C. 645

CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina

DecidedFebruary 5, 1890

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 10 S.E. 870 (State v. . Brown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. . Brown, 10 S.E. 870, 106 N.C. 645 (N.C. 1890).

Pincite

Opinion

Clark, J :

There is no statement of case on appeal, no assignment of error, and, upon a careful inspection of the record, no error appears.

The bill of indictment is substantially in the form authorized by ch. 58, Acts of 1887, albeit it contains some expressions not required by it, and which are mere surplusage. The validity of that act, and the sufficiency of an indictment drawn in accordance with it, were sustained by this Court in State v. Moore, 104 N. C., 743. We cite that case and affirm it as to this point.

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Clark, J :

There is no statement of case on appeal, no assignment of error, and, upon a careful inspection of the record, no error appears.

The bill of indictment is substantially in the form authorized by ch. 58, Acts of 1887, albeit it contains some expressions not required by it, and which are mere surplusage. The validity of that act, and the sufficiency of an indictment drawn in accordance with it, were sustained by this Court in State v. Moore, 104 N. C., 743. We cite that case and affirm it as to this point.

No error.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

10 S.E. 870, 106 N.C. 645, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-brown-nc-1890.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack