State v. Brown

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Brown

489 S.W.3d 818, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 422, 2015 WL 1813476

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 21, 2015

DocketNo. ED 100709

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 489 S.W.3d 818 (State v. Brown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Brown, 489 S.W.3d 818, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 422, 2015 WL 1813476 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Eddie Brown (“Defendant”) appeals from the trial court’s judgment, following a [819]*819bench trial, finding him to be a prior and persistent felony offender and convicting him of first degree robbery, in violation of Section 569.020, RSMo. (2000); kidnapping, in violation of Section 565.110; second degree robbery, in violation of Section 569.030; and resisting a felony arrest, in violation of Section 575.150. The court sentenced Defendant to 30 years of imprisonment for each of the two robbery convictions, 30 years for the kidnapping conviction, and seven years for the conviction of resisting a felony arrest. The court ordered all four sentences to run concurrently, for a total of 30 years’ imprisonment. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Eddie Brown (“Defendant”) appeals from the trial court’s judgment, following a [819]*819bench trial, finding him to be a prior and persistent felony offender and convicting him of first degree robbery, in violation of Section 569.020, RSMo. (2000); kidnapping, in violation of Section 565.110; second degree robbery, in violation of Section 569.030; and resisting a felony arrest, in violation of Section 575.150. The court sentenced Defendant to 30 years of imprisonment for each of the two robbery convictions, 30 years for the kidnapping conviction, and seven years for the conviction of resisting a felony arrest. The court ordered all four sentences to run concurrently, for a total of 30 years’ imprisonment. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

489 S.W.3d 818, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 422, 2015 WL 1813476, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-brown-moctapp-2015.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack