State v. Brown

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Brown

475 S.W.3d 704, 2015 WL 1813146

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 21, 2015·No. No. ED 100793·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

The defendant, Evrick Brown, appeals the judgment and sentence entered by the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis following his conviction by a jury of one count of first-degree assault, in violation of section 565.050 RSMo. (2000), and one count of armed criminal action, in violation of section 571.015. The trial court sentenced the defendant as a persistent offender to life imprisonment for the first-degree assault and to a consecutive term of 15 years for the armed criminal action. Finding no error, we affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision.

We affirm the trial court’s judgment. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM

The defendant, Evrick Brown, appeals the judgment and sentence entered by the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis following his conviction by a jury of one count of first-degree assault, in violation of section 565.050 RSMo. (2000), and one count of armed criminal action, in violation of section 571.015. The trial court sentenced the defendant as a persistent offender to life imprisonment for the first-degree assault and to a consecutive term of 15 years for the armed criminal action. Finding no error, we affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision.

We affirm the trial court’s judgment. Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Brown, 475 S.W.3d 704, 2015 WL 1813146 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

475 S.W.3d 704 (State v. Brown) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related