State v. Brown

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Brown

446 S.W.3d 737, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 1178, 2014 WL 5580057

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedOctober 21, 2014

DocketNo. ED 100737

StatusPublished

This text of 446 S.W.3d 737 (State v. Brown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Brown, 446 S.W.3d 737, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 1178, 2014 WL 5580057 (Mo. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Boyce Brown, appeals from the trial court’s judgment entered upon a jury verdict convicting him of first-degree robbery. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court committed no reversible error. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Boyce Brown, appeals from the trial court’s judgment entered upon a jury verdict convicting him of first-degree robbery. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court committed no reversible error. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

446 S.W.3d 737, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 1178, 2014 WL 5580057, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-brown-moctapp-2014.