State v. Brown

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Brown

936 S.W.2d 868, 1997 Mo. App. LEXIS 18, 1997 WL 3351

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 7, 1997

DocketNo. 70340

StatusPublished

This text of 936 S.W.2d 868 (State v. Brown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Brown, 936 S.W.2d 868, 1997 Mo. App. LEXIS 18, 1997 WL 3351 (Mo. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Richard Brown, appeals the judgment of conviction for unlawful use of a weapon, RSMo § 571.030.1(1) (1994), entered by the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis after a jury trial. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file and find the judgment is supported by sufficient evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence, and no error of law appears. Because an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Richard Brown, appeals the judgment of conviction for unlawful use of a weapon, RSMo § 571.030.1(1) (1994), entered by the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis after a jury trial. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file and find the judgment is supported by sufficient evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence, and no error of law appears. Because an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

936 S.W.2d 868, 1997 Mo. App. LEXIS 18, 1997 WL 3351, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-brown-moctapp-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack