State v. Brown

87 S.W. 1197, 188 Mo. 400, 1905 Mo. LEXIS 27
CourtSupreme Court of Missouri
DecidedMay 16, 1905
StatusPublished

This text of 87 S.W. 1197 (State v. Brown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Brown, 87 S.W. 1197, 188 Mo. 400, 1905 Mo. LEXIS 27 (Mo. 1905).

Opinion

FOX, J.

There was no bill of exceptions filed in this cause and the case is here by appeal upon the record proper.

The record discloses that on November 2,1903, the prosecuting attorney of Ripley county, Missouri, filed in the circuit court of said county an information charging the defendant with taking a female person, under the age of eighteen years, from her mother, who had legal charge of the person of- said female child, for the purpose of concubinage and cohabitation with him as man and wife, which acts are prohibited and denounced by section 1842, Revised Statutes 1899.

Defendant waived formal arraignment and entered his plea of not guilty. Upon a trial by a jury a verdict of guilty was returned and his punishment assessed at two years in the penitentiary. Judgment [401]*401and sentence was entered of record in accordance with the verdict, and from this judgment defendant appeals.

The proceedings during the progress of the trial .have not been preserved by the bill of exceptions and none is on file before us, and an examination of the record proper discloses substantial regularity; hence, the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed, and it is so ordered.

Gantt, J., concurs; Burgess, P. J., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
87 S.W. 1197, 188 Mo. 400, 1905 Mo. LEXIS 27, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-brown-mo-1905.