State v. Brown

592 So. 2d 397, 1992 La. LEXIS 231, 1992 WL 16656
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Brown. Read the opinion of the Court — 548 So. 2d 1222
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided January 27, 1992·No. No. 92-KH-0166·Published

Opinion

In re Brown, Joe Nathan; — Defendant(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “H”, No. 274-354.

The relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on an application for post conviction relief he has filed on or about September 23, 1991. If relator’s representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the application. If relator’s representation is incorrect, the district court is ordered to accept, file, and act upon the relator’s application which is herewith transferred to the district court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Brown, 592 So. 2d 397, 1992 La. LEXIS 231, 1992 WL 16656 (La. 1992).

592 So. 2d 397 (State v. Brown) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.