State v. Brown

31 A.3d 382, 302 Conn. 944
Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided October 18, 2011·No. Not in source·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

31 A.3d 382 (2011)
302 Conn. 944

STATE of Connecticut
v.
Tyrone BROWN.

Not in source.

Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Decided October 18, 2011.

G. Douglas Nash, assigned counsel, in support of the petition.

Timothy J. Sugrue, senior assistant state's attorney, in opposition.

The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 131 Conn.App. 275, 26 A.3d 674, is granted, limited to the following issue:

"Did the Appellate Court properly determine that the defendant's refusal to answer questions after he was given Miranda warnings was admissible?"

NORCOTT, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Brown, 31 A.3d 382, 302 Conn. 944 (Colo. 2011).

31 A.3d 382 (State v. Brown) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jan G. v. Commissioner of Correction
Connecticut Appellate Court, 2026
Zachs v. Commissioner of Correction
205 Conn. App. 243 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2021)