Home/Supreme Court of North Carolina/State v. Brower & Johnson

State v. Brower & Johnson

243 S.E.2d 143, 293 N.C. 259, 1977 N.C. LEXIS 924
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided September 12, 1977·No. No. 27 PC·Published·Cited by 11 cases

Opinion

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION

INASMUCH as defendants did not assign as error on appeal the failure of the trial judge to place the burden of proving the absence of heat of passion or the absence of self-defense on the state, see State v. Brower & Johnson, 289 N.C. 644 (1976), they have waived their right now to complain about such errors. Hankerson v. North Carolina, --- U.S. ---, 53 L.Ed. 2d 306, 316, n. 8 (1977). Now, therefore, it is

ORDERED by the Court in Conference that defendants’ motion for reconsideration be and it is hereby denied.

This the 12th day of September, 1977.

James G. Exum, Jr. Associate Justice

For the Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Brower & Johnson, 243 S.E.2d 143, 293 N.C. 259, 1977 N.C. LEXIS 924 (N.C. 1977).

243 S.E.2d 143 (State v. Brower & Johnson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Jackson
716 S.E.2d 61 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2011)
State v. McDonald
593 S.E.2d 793 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2004)
State v. McLaughlin
372 S.E.2d 49 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1988)
State v. Stanton
353 S.E.2d 385 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1987)
State v. Perry
317 S.E.2d 428 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1984)
State v. Byrd
312 S.E.2d 528 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1984)
State v. Cobbins
311 S.E.2d 653 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1984)
James Lewis Cole v. L. v. Stevenson, Superintendent and Attorney General of the State of North Carolina, Rufus L. Edmisten
620 F.2d 1055 (Fourth Circuit, 1980)
State v. Locklear
251 S.E.2d 638 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1979)
State v. Watson
246 S.E.2d 25 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1978)