State v. BROWDEN

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. BROWDEN

285 S.W.3d 429, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 818, 2009 WL 1665263

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 16, 2009·No. ED 91659·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Lindell Browden appeals from the trial court’s judgment entered upon a jury ver- *430 diet convicting him of one count of first-degree assault and one count of second-degree robbery. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error on the part of the tidal court. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Lindell Browden appeals from the trial court’s judgment entered upon a jury ver- *430 diet convicting him of one count of first-degree assault and one count of second-degree robbery. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error on the part of the tidal court. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b).

State v. BROWDEN, 285 S.W.3d 429, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 818, 2009 WL 1665263 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

285 S.W.3d 429 (State v. BROWDEN) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related