State v. Brow

15 A. 216, 64 N.H. 577

Supreme Court of New Hampshire·Decided June 5, 1888·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Doe, C. J.

The defendant’s purpose of keeping the girl as his mistress was not “ the purpose of prostitution ” within the meaning of Gen. Laws, c. 274, s. 10.

Exceptions sustained.

Clark, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Brow, 15 A. 216, 64 N.H. 577 (N.H. 1888).

Pincite

15 A. 216 (State v. Brow) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.