State v. Broussard

490 So. 2d 273
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedJune 20, 1986
Docket86-KK-1003
StatusPublished
Cited by20 cases

This text of 490 So. 2d 273 (State v. Broussard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Broussard, 490 So. 2d 273 (La. 1986).

Opinion

490 So.2d 273 (1986)

STATE of Louisiana
v.
Lennis Tommy BROUSSARD.

No. 86-KK-1003.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 20, 1986.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the court of appeal is reversed and vacated. The judgment of the district court granting the motion to quash is reinstated and the case against defendant is dismissed. R.S. 14:74 is a criminal statute. After defendant is charged with criminal neglect of family, the provisions of R.S. 14:75, 75.1 and 75.2 come into play. Some of these are necessarily criminal in nature. The defendant is *274 entitled to counsel and if he cannot afford one, counsel must be appointed to represent him. The trial judge shall explain the defendant's rights to him (cf. the customary "Boykin" examination) before any proceeding under 14:75 is initiated.

LEMMON, J., would grant the writ and docket for argument.

COLE, J., respectfully dissents.

COLE, Justice dissenting.

I believe a correct analysis of the law is set forth in the opinion by the Court of Appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Vallot
926 So. 2d 98 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2006)
State of Louisiana v. Maureen Vallot
Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2006
Turner v. Busby
883 So. 2d 412 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 2004)
Krieger v. Commonwealth
567 S.E.2d 557 (Court of Appeals of Virginia, 2002)
State v. King
707 So. 2d 1374 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1998)
State ex rel. Alexis
706 So. 2d 1074 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1998)
St. Germain v. Breaux
702 So. 2d 691 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1997)
State v. Sanders
648 So. 2d 1272 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1994)
Caughron v. Caughron
579 So. 2d 1214 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1991)
State v. Thomas
579 So. 2d 1086 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1991)
State v. Veal
579 So. 2d 486 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1991)
State v. Creamer
528 So. 2d 667 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1988)
State v. R.J.B.
524 So. 2d 272 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1988)
State v. Maxey
520 So. 2d 1000 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1987)
State v. St. Pierre
515 So. 2d 769 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1987)
State v. Holloway
511 So. 2d 461 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1987)
State v. Scott
508 So. 2d 101 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1987)
State v. St. Pierre
507 So. 2d 837 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
490 So. 2d 273, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-broussard-la-1986.