State v. Broten

Supreme Court of Minnesota

State v. Broten

341 N.W.2d 279, 1983 Minn. LEXIS 1356

CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota

DecidedDecember 16, 1983

DocketNo. C1-82-853

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 341 N.W.2d 279 (State v. Broten) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Broten, 341 N.W.2d 279, 1983 Minn. LEXIS 1356 (Mich. 1983).

Pincite

Opinion

KELLEY, Justice.

Defendant was found guilty by a district court jury of charges of burglary and theft, Minn.Stat. §§ 609.58, subd. 2, and 609.52, subd. 2(1) (1982). Those charges were based on defendant’s role in the burglary of a Roseau store on April 5, 1980. The trial court sentenced defendant to a year and a day in prison but stayed execution of the sentence. On this appeal defendant raises issues relating to the adequacy of the complaint, alleged misconduct of the sheriff’s office before trial, alleged failure of the prosecutor to follow the discovery rules, and alleged misconduct by the prosecutor in his closing statement to the jury. The record on appeal not only fails to support any of these contentions but compels the conclusion that defendant was [280]*280properly charged and fairly tried and convicted.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

KELLEY, Justice.

Defendant was found guilty by a district court jury of charges of burglary and theft, Minn.Stat. §§ 609.58, subd. 2, and 609.52, subd. 2(1) (1982). Those charges were based on defendant’s role in the burglary of a Roseau store on April 5, 1980. The trial court sentenced defendant to a year and a day in prison but stayed execution of the sentence. On this appeal defendant raises issues relating to the adequacy of the complaint, alleged misconduct of the sheriff’s office before trial, alleged failure of the prosecutor to follow the discovery rules, and alleged misconduct by the prosecutor in his closing statement to the jury. The record on appeal not only fails to support any of these contentions but compels the conclusion that defendant was [280]*280properly charged and fairly tried and convicted.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

341 N.W.2d 279, 1983 Minn. LEXIS 1356, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-broten-minn-1983.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack