State v. Broom
This text of 472 P.2d 823 (State v. Broom) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Defendant, upon trial by jury, was convicted of armed robbery. The indictment charged him with robbing a service station attendant at gunpoint, taking approximately $70 and the attendant’s gold wristwatch.
The attendant’s testimony at the trial was that a man whom he positively identified as the defendant assaulted him by threatening him with a small-caliber gun and then took approximately $70 and the attendant’s wristwatch. Contrary to defendant’s contention, even absent other corroborating evidence which was introduced, this was ample evidence to support the jury verdict.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
472 P.2d 823, 3 Or. App. 151, 1970 Ore. App. LEXIS 488, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-broom-orctapp-1970.